Attack Angle – Myths and Misconceptions

Attack Angle – Myths and Misconceptions

I hear many golfers say that they have a steep angle of attack. I’m not sure how they know this – perhaps they have been measured with a device which shows angle of attack, or perhaps they are just going off their divot depth. Either way, I thought it would make a nice article to look at the concept of angle of attack.

 

What Is Angle Of Attack?

Angle of attack refers to the angle the club approaches the ball – especially through the impact zone. While this is a singular 3D value, we often split it into horizontal angle of attack (or swing path) and a vertical component, which we call angle of attack.

Below is a 2D representation of a steep angle of attack

steep AOA

 

We even have positive, or upward angle of attacks. These can be beneficial with a driver.

positive AOA

And obviously we can have a neutral AOA which is neither down nor up.

 

Shaft/Swing Plane Is Not Angle Of Attack

Many people take a snapshot of their swing and see the clubshaft in a certain position and think that it indicates a certain angle of attack. For example

steep shaft

Many people will think that this position automatically creates a steep angle of attack

 

Shallow shaft

And most people also assume that this player will produce a shallow angle of attack.

However, the reality is that the players shown could produce the complete opposite of what you would imagine. I’m not sure what Garcia’s AOA is, but I know that the example of the player with the steep shaft had a pretty normal AOA number.

Even if we were to trace the movement the clubhead makes from hip high to hip high (the swing is relatively planar here – hence the name “Functional swing plane”), a steeper plane does not mean a steeper angle of attack (and vice versa).

swing plane

Plane is not angle of attack.

 

 

Swing Direction/Path Is Not Angle Of Attack

Following from this, lots of golfers think that because they have an out-to-in swing that they are automatically swinging too steep on the ball. While swinging left certainly does correlate with a steeper angle of attack, there are several other variables at play. I see just as many people swing left and be too shallow as I see players swing right and be too steep.

sand swing direction

The swing on the left may be just as shallow or even shallower than the swing on the right (in terms of AOA).

Changing swing direction often does change angle of attack in a way you would imagine – swinging more left will often make the angle of attack steeper and vice versa. However, we should caution against assuming that a slicer is too steep, or that a drawer is too shallow.

 

 

Divot Depth Is Not Angle Of Attack

I have seen a lot of amateurs bury the club a foot behind the ball, creating a trench big enough to hide in from the embarrassment. Often, this shot is met with the comment of

I got too steep on that one”

While this could be true, burying the club a foot behind the ball is usually more of a problem of swing arc height control (a concept I discuss in The Strike Plan) than it is steepness. Or, you could say, it’s not a steepness problem it’s a deepness problem.

 

deep

Here we see the low point not too far in front of the ball (hence the angle of attack is not very steep). However, due to the depth of the swing arc, contact with the ground is early.

I even see situations where a player has come in so shallow that their club is moving upwards at impact due to a low point which is behind the ball. The player then hits the ground early and thinks they came in too steep, whereas in fact the club was moving upwards.

Fat

This fat shot was caused by a low point which is behind the ball – which is a POSITIVE angle of attack. Lots of people mistake this for being steep, as they incorrectly link fat=steep.

Also, it is possible to come into impact relatively shallow, but produce a big divot because the club continues on that shallow trajectory for longer – a wide arc at the bottom.

arc widths

In the above picture, we see two different swing shapes (transparent and opaque). While the low point and divot depth are the same, the angle of attack may be different.

This can have several advantages – I explain how to achieve this in The Strike Plan in the shallowing module.

 

The Truth

The biggest influences on angle of attack are the swing radius, the swing plane and the low point position.

 

Low point position

Probably the biggest single factor on angle of attack is the position of the low point relative to the golf ball. (low-point = the lowest point of the swing arc).

For example, if the low point matches the golf ball, we will have a neutral angle of attack.

low point level

Low point level with ball = neutral AOA

 

If the low point gets further in front of the golf ball, we start to get more of a negative angle of attack

low point in front

Low point in front = negative AOA

 

And if the low point is behind the ball, we get a positive angle of attack

low point behind

Low point behind = positive AOA

 

Swing Plane

While I said earlier that swing plane does not equal angle of attack (and I stand by it), it still influences it. It combines with low point position to produce angle of attack. While it can get very complicated, a good general rule is;

The steeper the swing plane is through impact, the more angle of attack will vary if you move low point”

For example, in my teaching, I know that moving the low point forwards (with a Driver) by 1 inch will tend to make AOA 1 degree steeper. It’s about a 1:1 ratio.

However, with a 6 iron, as the vertical swing plane is steeper, moving the low point position forwards by an inch will tend to make the angle of attack 1.5 degrees steeper. It’s a 1:1.5 ratio.

 

Swing Radius

Swing radius is defined by where the center of curvature of the clubhead is through impact.

The tighter the swing circle, the narrower the swing arc is. The flatter the swing arc, the wider the swing arc is.

arc widths

Back to this picture – we can have a wider (opaque) or narrower (transparent) swing arc

It is important to note that we are only talking about the moments directly around the golf ball. Lots of people interpret a wide swing arc as one where the entire golf swing has width to it – which is not always true. In fact, this picture is exaggerated to highlight the concept.

Again, a complicated topic if you go into the nuances of it.

Luckily, there is an easier rule to remember – the wider the swing arc, the shallower an angle of attack will be (for any given low point position).

 

The Take-Homes

I understand that lots of this article will be information that is intellectually pleasing but perhaps a bit overboard for the average golfer. But I also understand that people who read my blog are often simply interested in such information.

However, if you take the time to digest this article, there are definitely bits which can be applicable to your own game – I certainly use this information when teaching (even if I don’t explicitly say it). To summarize the most practical parts of the article.

  • Angle of attack refers solely to how the club is approaching the ball into impact
  • Your angle of attack could be positive (upward), negative (downward) or neutral
  • Having a steep or shallow swing plane does not mean you have a steep or shallow AOA
  • Swinging out-to-in does not necessarily mean you have a steep AOA, and vice versa
  • Having a deep divot does not necessarily mean you are swinging steep. Swinging shallow does not necessarily mean you will have a shallow divot
  • While low point position, functional swing plane and swing radius all influence AOA, Low point position will typically be the dominant factor.

 

If you want to learn more about how to change/improve your low point position/arc width etc in order to strike the ball better than ever before, click below to check out The Strike Plan.

Strike plan enter

4 Comments

  • Golf Pro-am

    Very Interesting ! Thank you for theses pictures which could help me to explain and show what’s the good angle of attack. Hello from France 😉

  • Steve Ruis

    It seems to me that a primary reason for the so called “weight shift” is simply to move the center of the swing arc forward ahead of the ball. Just shifting your weight has almost no affect on the force with which one hits the ball (note that baseball players no longer stride into the ball, they tend now to shift slightly down and back against a straight front leg, which provides more power), but it does move the center of the swing arc from where it was at setup (basically at the ball) to just in front of the ball which creates a downward strike of the ball if the arc is deep enough. Moe Norman claimed that he kept his club face square and on line longer than others. I have read where people scoff at this, but if you look at videos of Moe’s swing and watch his belt buckle, his “weight shift” was quite long, which would add a linear component to his swing arc at the bottom, due to the timing of the shift.

  • Tom

    It appears to me that a pro hitting a ball first and then the turf (placing the ball either in the middle of their stance or slightly forward depending on the irons used) is in fact playing the ball back of their stance. Their body shifts forward thus at impact the ball is now behind their setup position.

    For amateurs, wouldn’t it be simpler just to set the ball back in their stance to get a cleaner strike? Accept that you might lose some power but at least the strike should be consistent.
    Any thoughts?

    • admin

      Yes – weight shift is one element of low point position. However, we have to think more in 3D – things such as hand path, club swing direction (a huge one) and release style all go into creating the low point of the swing (I discuss these in depth in The Strike Plan). Ultimately, there are many ways to create a functional low point position.

Post A Comment

YOUR CAPTCHA HERE

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.