I get far too many emails on this topic to ignore it – and it is one of the most common discussions I see on my lesson tee and with amateurs chatting amongst themselves on the range.
So, how far back should you swing the golf club? Let’s explore that topic
Before We Do
I’m giving away copies of my Ebook “Golf Hacks” for FREE (normally $9.95).
Simply enter your email below if you want one sent to your email.
Overswing/Underswing
I hear this all the time,
“I keep over swinging the club”
Or
“I can’t complete my backswing”
This stems from the fallacy that there is a perfect position to be in at the top of the golf swing. Usually, getting the club shaft to be parallel to the ground at the top is cited as the “optimal position”, but this is really just an arbitrary look that doesn’t really give us performance-relevance.
The reality is, there is more than one way to do it – just look at the following examples of pro’s who swing much longer than parallel.
And players on tour who swing the club short of parallel, below.
Power Play
A general rule would have it that the longer you swing the club, the more potential you have for generating clubhead speed.
This definitely makes sense from a physics perspective – if a clubhead is accelerating over a longer distance, it will be moving faster by the time it reaches impact. This increases our distance, all else being equal. This is why we see long drive champions, like Jason Zuback, Jamie Sadlowski and Joe Miller, with their incredibly long backswings.
However, there are multiple variables we have to consider.
For example, what if (in an attempt to make the backswing longer) a player stretches their muscles in a way which causes them to enter a range of their motion where they are weak, and thus cannot produce as much power? This player might get a longer backswing and actually lose speed (or even risk injury).
Or, what if the player seeking extra backswing length now loses precision in how they apply the clubhead? They might transfer less of that clubhead speed to the ball, and even open up their dispersion.
Precision Play
It makes sense (and is generally the case) that a shorter backswing would provide more control, even if it costs us speed.
Just like when we are hammering a nail, we initially start out with a smaller tapping motion, before adding swing length to increase the hammer speed. However, if we lose control and hit our thumb, we quickly trade off speed for precision by going back to the smaller, more controlled swings.
However, it’s not always the case in golf – I have seen examples of players who take longer swings and become more precise in both the outcome and the ball-strike. It’s rare, but it does happen.
3 Different Types
So, for the most part, we are trading off the potential for more speed with a loss in strike quality and clubface orientation consistency (direction).
When testing players, I have seen 3 different types of results from changing swing length;
PLAYER 1- Loses everything
This player, when changing their swing length, creates the worst of both worlds.
Someone making a longer swing not only loses their ability to find the sweet spot, but they also present the clubface direction in a more inconsistent manner AND their swing speed doesn’t increase (or even decreases) because their body cannot make use of the extra swing length effectively.
The player who shortened their swing not only loses clubhead speed (which makes sense), but they don’t hit the sweet spot more often and/or present the face angle with less consistency.
Both of the above players are now shorter and more crooked.
PLAYER 2 -Gains everything
Ah, the holy grail – this player picks up clubhead speed AND strikes it better.
I have seen this with overly analytical players who are very mechanical and deliberate with their movements. Often, freeing them up to make more of a swish at the ball improves their speed and clubhead presentation.
I’ve even seen it with players who have crazy long swings with no control, and shortening their swing aids their strike AND direction, while having little effect on clubhead speed. Due to the improvement in strike quality, the player is now both more accurate and longer.
PLAYER 3 – The trade-off
This group of golfers have a big decision to make.
Players shortening their swings will often create better strike and direction consistency, but at the loss of some distance. Now, if you increase your greens/fairways hit by 30% and lose 5 yards, it’s a no-brainer decision – this is good for you. However, if you hit your target just 10% more often but lose 30 yards, it’s not worth it statistically.
Players lengthening their swings will often create more speed and more potential for distance, but at a loss of face strike and/or direction quality. If this player picks up 5mph but hits the ball shockingly poor, we likely wouldn’t continue with this approach. However, if a player adds 10+mph of speed, even with poor outcomes, it might be worth pursuing (as we can always re-calibrate the strike and direction later).
The How
One thing that hasn’t been discussed here is “how” we create a shorter or longer swing. This would also have an effect on the positive or negative influence on the results.
For example, you could create a longer swing by
- Creating a bigger shoulder turn
- Completely collapsing the arms
- Moving the lead upper arm more across the chest (horizontal adduction)
- Adding vertical arm movement to the swing
- Creating a bigger hip turn/allowing the lead foot to come off the ground
- Adding more wrist hinge (radial deviation)
- Changing hip/spine extension
amongst other things. Each of the above would have a different effect on the golfer, their sequencing and other impact variables. If I asked 100 golfers to swing the club back farther, they would all use different combinations of 1-7.
What options would be best for a golfer (or worst) would depend on many variables – including what they currently do, physical limitations, equipment etc. This is why it would be best to see an experienced instructor who can guide you to the optimal approach for you based on their experience and what they see in you.
How would you lengthen the swing of this player?
My Own Experience
When I was younger, I used to swing the club so long that I could see the clubhead out of the corner of my eye at the top of the swing.
I tried for years to shorten that swing directly – mainly because I wanted to copy my idol, Tiger Woods. But I, unfortunately, got the worst of both worlds – shorter and more crooked.
After years of hard work, I gave up on caring about my swing length. I placed all of my focus on more performance relevant things – such as strike quality, face and path presentation etc. As a result, not only did I get better outcomes (which is inevitable if you improve impact), but my swing naturally shortened itself over time, as I got stronger and less flexible.
My backswing is now very close to parallel at the top of my swing, although it’s just a happy accident – not something I am consciously trying to achieve.
I think it’s fun to experiment with swing length every now and again, as you may find out something about your own game that surprises you. We can even test different swing lengths to see which ones produce the best outcomes for you.
But overall, I am generally of the philosophy that it shouldn’t be something to be overly concerned with. I also believe that, for the most part, your swing length will veer towards what is right for you and your unique mix of variables without much conscious effort. Just like a beginner understands that they have to tap the nail, and an advanced blacksmith can take a massive whack at it, our bodies are equipped to hone in on what helps us (over time).
There are always exceptions and outliers to the above situation.
What I Don’t Know
This article (disappointingly) is not going to be able to answer the question “how long should my backswing be”, as there are too many variables involved.
However, it should give you food for thought on the topic, and cause to go out and experiment a little.
What I DO Know
If you want to get better at golf, you absolutely 100% have to improve your impact – it’s physics!
This is why my premium programs are dedicated to either improving the impact variables that relate to the outcomes you desire.
For example, if you want to hit the ball more consistent distances and longer overall, then focusing on ground contact and face contact will help you achieve that.
The Strike Plan shows you everything you need to do to improve your technique, skill and golf IQ, so you can get rid of shanks/toe shots/fats and thins quicker than ever. Click the image below to learn more.
On the other hand, if you are tired of losing shots left/right and want to improve your accuracy, The Accuracy Plan guides you through all the swing changes that can help you fix the hook/slice, as well as skill drills to further refine and increase consistency of direction. Click the image below to learn more.
Article Summary
- The idea of “swinging to parallel” is pretty arbitrary.
- Plenty of pros swing the club short of parallel, and plenty of them have huge over-swings.
- A longer swing usually offers more power potential – although there are several other factors that come into play as to whether your body can harness that extra swing length.
- Most long driver golfers have much longer swings.
- Shorter swings, in general, are more controlled – thus offering better strike and direction consistency. however, this can come at the cost of distance – and the two competing factors need to be weighed up.
- There are many ways to lengthen/shorten your golf swing – each way will have a different effect on the proceeding movement pattern.
- Don’t be afraid to experiment a little in your practice. Try a few shots swinging shorter/longer than normal. See how it feels and how the ball flight changes.
Paul Grant
Wonderful explanations of the options that come into play when seeking more distance.
Kevin
Great article. After working on the Strike Plan last winter and early spring (and seeing great results in more consistent strikes), I went to an instructor to work on stability, weight shift and position fundamentals. He did not specifically work on swing length, but the end result was a lengthening of my backswing (how? more or less #4 adding vertical arm movement to the swing).
I immediately got my old distances back; my weight shift was more complete. So this was a great thing.
But something maybe more important happened as result.
My swing rhythm improved.
I finally felt that I was no longer too quick in the transition, something that I had tried for years to achieve. At last I felt that I was able to “finish the backswing”, something I had had printed on golf balls a few years back.
And my hit the ball swing started to look a lot more like my practice swing.
Rob Dobbie
Food for thought,excellent article
Jon
Can you give a feel or swing thought for this – Moving the lead upper arm more across the chest (horizontal adduction)?
Also for this -Adding vertical arm movement to the swing
Great article i think creating longer swings can be really good because distance is so important today and definitely more fun to hit it longer.
admin
Imagine you have just been to the fairground and won a giant teddy bear and you have your arms wrapped around him.
Horizontal adduction – squeezing the bear
Vertical arm movement – lift your arms over the bear’s head
Ken Robson
And, of course, with a longer back swing the speed will only increase if you are still accelerating at impact. If you reach your top speed earlier there will be no gain, speed wise.
Richard Forster
One thing is certain, golf doesn’t get easier the older you get. It is one of the challenges in life to try to preserve a physical and natural ability – rhythm, balance, articulation, strength, speed, coordination, and eyesight/aim, that are in inevitable decline. The uncomplicated and perfect swings we see in the Open is to be admired while it lasts. And it’s nice to think we can emulate those few endowed practitioners who rise to the top. Of course, it doesn’t turn out that way.
But there is one thing I can recommend. I was struggling to fix many of the ball hitting problems – they persisted and coaching from a professional was expensive and temporary. That is until I videoed myself – from address to swing completion. The first time I did that, I was appalled by what I saw myself NOT doing correctly compared to a pro. A year later, learning from my video footage, and homework on many articles such as these about the dynamic physics of club, ball and human articulation – particularly the Driver (a very special club it seems) I have at least reached a repeatable orthodoxy that works – giving results and is something one can be satisfied with. it won’t get any better at my age.
Debbie W
I agree that as we increase in age especially over 65 replicating a swing is harder. My Driver is the only club I can hit the fairway all day long. Not sure if it is because it is a shallow swing. Now my hybrids and 6 and 7 iron are not consistent on the strike. I was a 12.5 index in January and now a 15. We played short courses this winter compared to at home. Too many bad strikes. My latest focus that drives me nuts right now is what to do in my back swing…….
Debbie from Oregon